August 2000
PM217 : PROJECT MANAGEMENT

QUESTION 3

Total Marks: 15 Marks

Click here to access other questions

SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
Solutions and allocated marks are indicated in green.
Return to
Question 3

(a) One of the reasons for a project failure is perpetual maintenance. Explain how this situation can arise and give two ways in which it can be avoided. [3]
- Perpetual maintenance is often caused by poor design: much of the estimated 60% to 70% and more of systems costs that are spent on maintenance could be eliminated by not designing in so many mistakes. [1]
- Effective management and technical reviews of the interim system development deliverables, documentation and code, could eliminate many of the bugs currently delivered into production. [1]
- Comprehensive, intelligently applied testing, throughout the development life cycle, is also a key factor in delivering quality, error-free code. [1]

(b) There are many approaches applied to reduce the failure rate in a project. Name and briefly explain any three approaches. [6]
The following ways can help in reducing failure rate in a project
development process.
- Divide and conquer
- Measurable deliverables
- Reviews and walk-throughs
- Testing
- Project staffing
- Change control
- Maintenance
(Any three of the above, 1 mark for identification and 1 mark for an
explanation) [6]

(c) In project management there is a great difference in using the traditional
approach and new approach. Briefly discuss any two problems associated with the traditional approach and the two benefits in choosing the new approach in project development. [6]
Problems associated with the traditional approach
- Inattention to the importance of customers.
Customer satisfaction is often treated as an afterthought. Most energy is directed towards satisfying the famous triple constraints
of time, budget and specifications.
- Single-minded focus on a fixed set of tools for dealing with scheduling, budgeting, and resource allocation.
- Narrow definition of what it should be concerned with.
First, traditional project management often limits the project life cycle to
four phases: concept, planning, execution and closeout.
Second, the traditional project management approach holds a constricted
view of what project managers should be able to do.
(Any two of the above: Identification and explanation of each point carry
1 mark each) [4]
Benefits in choosing the new approach
- project management must become more customer focused;
- it must explore the use of new management tools;
- it must redefine the role of project managers, giving them more power to operate effectively.
(Any two of the above, 1 mark each) [2]