August
1997 QUESTION 3 Total Marks: 20 Marks |
Click here to access other
questions
SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS |
3. | You have been made responsible for hardware acquisition within your organisation. | ||
(a) The hardware acquisition process begins with a determination of needs. How can these needs be determined? | [2] | ||
The determination of needs in the hardware acquisition process should be based upon interviews with users | [1] | ||
or upon information from the Information Systems area of the organisation. | [1] | ||
[2 marks] | |||
(b) Once identified, hardware needs can be split into two separate categories: mandatory attributes and desirable attributes. Explain these two categories, and give at least two examples for each category. | [6] | ||
Mandatory attributes are those that must be possessed by the piece of equipment: | [1] | ||
examples of possible mandatory needs include: hardware compatibility; purchase price; speed; documentation; availability of training; operation costs; installation time; maintenance contract; software compatibility; footprint; capacity; delivery date; waste heat; guarantees and warranty; financing alternatives; power requirements (1 mark for each of two examples) | |||
Desirable attributes increase the attractiveness of the system under consideration, but are not considered essential. | [1] | ||
Examples include: capacity; maintenance contract; operating costs; field upgradeability; available training; cabling constraints; purchase price; waste heat; speed; free trial period; power requirements; delivery date; available financing. (1 mark for each of two examples). | |||
This is an easy part of the question; since almost any need could be considered mandatory or desirable depending upon the circumstances. | |||
[6 marks] | |||
(c) What is a Request For Proposal? Is it a legal contract? | [2] | ||
A Request For Proposal is a request to all interested parties to submit a formal bids to satisfy hardware needs. | [1] | ||
It is not a legal contract (although it may have legal implications). | [1] | ||
[2 marks] | |||
(d) How might a Request For Proposal be formulated so that it can appears to be objective but actually guarantees the selection of a particular product? | [2] | ||
A desirable (or trivial) attribute | [1] | ||
that is unique to one product or vendor could be included as mandatory; | [1] | ||
this would give the appearance of objectivity while actually forcing the choice of that product or vendor. | |||
[2 marks] | |||
(e) Outline the form and content of a Request For Proposal, explaining the contents of each section. | [8] | ||
A Request for Proposal should contain | |||
introduction: | [1] | ||
reason for RFP; organisation name; contact names and addresses; important dates | [1] | ||
organisations background information; | [1] | ||
history; future expectations; description of existing systems | [1] | ||
requirements: | [1] | ||
mandatory and desirable attributes of equipment | [1] | ||
form of proposal: | [1] | ||
format in which the proposal should be submitted | [1] | ||
In each case, 1 mark for the section, 1 mark for a suitable explanation of the contents. If the candidates supplies evaluation criteria in addition to the above, this is correct but no extra marks should be awarded. If a candidate supplies evaluation criteria in place of requirements, marks should be awarded for this section instead. | |||
[8 marks] |